Manning v. Waldron

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Manning v. Waldron

283 A.D. 1008, 131 N.Y.S.2d 171, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6100

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 20, 1954

StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D. 1008 (Manning v. Waldron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manning v. Waldron, 283 A.D. 1008, 131 N.Y.S.2d 171, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6100 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment as to defendant Van Vaulkenburg affirmed, with costs and judgment as to defendant Waldron and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict of the jury is against the weight of evidence. All concur as to the affirmance as to Van Vaulkenburg; as to Waldron, all concur except Piper and Van Duser, JJ., who dissent and vote for affirmance. (Appeal from a judgment for defendant Waldron for no cause of action, after the trial court had granted a nonsuit in favor of defendant Van Vaulkenburg, in an automobile negligence action. The order denied a motion for a new trial.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Kimball, Piper, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment as to defendant Van Vaulkenburg affirmed, with costs and judgment as to defendant Waldron and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict of the jury is against the weight of evidence. All concur as to the affirmance as to Van Vaulkenburg; as to Waldron, all concur except Piper and Van Duser, JJ., who dissent and vote for affirmance. (Appeal from a judgment for defendant Waldron for no cause of action, after the trial court had granted a nonsuit in favor of defendant Van Vaulkenburg, in an automobile negligence action. The order denied a motion for a new trial.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Kimball, Piper, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D. 1008, 131 N.Y.S.2d 171, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manning-v-waldron-nyappdiv-1954.