Manning v. United States

212 F. App'x 967

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided December 5, 2006·No. No. 2006-1553·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Richard Thomas Manning submits correspondence that we treat as a motion for reconsideration of the court’s October 4, 2006 order dismissing Manning’s appeal for failure to pay the filing fee.

Manning has now paid the filing fee.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The comet’s October 4, 2006 dismissal order is vacated, the mandate is recalled, and the appeal is reinstated.

(2) The Appellees should calculate the due date for their briefs from the date of filing of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Richard Thomas Manning submits correspondence that we treat as a motion for reconsideration of the court’s October 4, 2006 order dismissing Manning’s appeal for failure to pay the filing fee.

Manning has now paid the filing fee.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The comet’s October 4, 2006 dismissal order is vacated, the mandate is recalled, and the appeal is reinstated.

(2) The Appellees should calculate the due date for their briefs from the date of filing of this order.

Manning v. United States, 212 F. App'x 967 (Fed. Cir. 2006).

Pincite

212 F. App'x 967 (Manning v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.