Manning v. State

486 P.2d 485, 87 Nev. 299, 1971 Nev. LEXIS 414
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedJune 24, 1971
DocketNo. 6384
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 486 P.2d 485 (Manning v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manning v. State, 486 P.2d 485, 87 Nev. 299, 1971 Nev. LEXIS 414 (Neb. 1971).

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Appellant having been convicted of possession of marijuana (NRS 453.030), his sole claim of error is that “[t]he court below erred in denying Appellant’s Motion to Suppress evidence produced from the illegal arrest of the Appellant, such arrest not being made under probable cause.”

The record reflects that Officer Christopher, who knew appellant by name and had a field identification card concerning him, observed appellant smoking a cigarette as the officer drove toward him in a marked police vehicle. Apparently seeing the police car, appellant flipped his cigarette in such a way as to arouse Christopher’s suspicions; Christopher radioed for assistance; then, awaiting the arrival of “back-up” officers, he detained appellant and went through his clothing, finding nothing. When Officer Mathis arrived, he retrieved a marijuana cigarette from the place on a nearby doughnut shop parking lot, where Officer Christopher directed him to look. The conviction is based entirely on this evidence, found on the parking lot where appellant had thrown it, not on anything taken from appellant during the course of what he contends was an unlawful “search” of his person.

“Here we do not reach the question of whether there was an illegal search and seizure following an illegal arrest. . .

“The marijuana cigarette was not procured incident to a search, but it was abandoned property when it was retrieved by the police officers. In Stamps v. State, supra, this court held that where police officers discovered evidence in a public area [301]*301where it was voluntarily thrown, there was no search, and said: ‘Looking at that which is open to view is not a search.’ ” Oliver v. State, 85 Nev. 10, 12, 449 P.2d 252, 253 (1969). See also: Stamps v. State, 83 Nev. 230, 428 P.2d 187 (1967).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Merica v. State
488 P.2d 1161 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
486 P.2d 485, 87 Nev. 299, 1971 Nev. LEXIS 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manning-v-state-nev-1971.