Manning v. State

767 So. 2d 1278, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12370, 2000 WL 1421358
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Manning v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17127
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 28, 2000·No. No. 1D99-1373·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises three issues on appeal. We find one to have merit. We reverse appellant’s habitual felony offender sentence based on Walls v. State, 765 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), and Weaver v. State, 764 So.2d 911 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). In all other respects, we affirm.

BARFIELD, C.J., and BOOTH, J., concur; WOLF, J., specially concurring with written opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manning v. State, 767 So. 2d 1278, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12370, 2000 WL 1421358 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

767 So. 2d 1278 (Manning v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weaver v. State
764 So. 2d 911 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Walls v. State
765 So. 2d 733 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)