Manning v. State
Opinion
Peter MANNING, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Louis G. Carres, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert L. Teitler, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant "affirmatively selected" to be sentenced by the trial court under the sentencing guidelines. See § 921.001, Fla. Stat. (1983); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. On appeal he challenges for the first time the constitutionality of the application of the above cited statute to the facts of his case. Only challenges which allege facial unconstitutionality of a statute raise a question as to subject matter jurisdiction and are therefore arguable, as fundamental, for the first time on appeal. Thus, the instant challenge was waived by the failure to raise it in the trial court. Trushin v. State, 425 So.2d 1126 (Fla. 1983); Alexander v. State, 450 So.2d 1212 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).
ANSTEAD, C.J., and HERSEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
461 So. 2d 1025 (Manning v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.