Manning v. State

461 So. 2d 1025, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 129
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 4, 1985·No. 83-2343·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

461 So.2d 1025 (1985)

Peter MANNING, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 83-2343.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

January 4, 1985.
Rehearing Denied January 30, 1985.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Louis G. Carres, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert L. Teitler, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant "affirmatively selected" to be sentenced by the trial court under the sentencing guidelines. See § 921.001, Fla. Stat. (1983); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701. On appeal he challenges for the first time the constitutionality of the application of the above cited statute to the facts of his case. Only challenges which allege facial unconstitutionality of a statute raise a question as to subject matter jurisdiction and are therefore arguable, as fundamental, for the first time on appeal. Thus, the instant challenge was waived by the failure to raise it in the trial court. Trushin v. State, 425 So.2d 1126 (Fla. 1983); Alexander v. State, 450 So.2d 1212 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

ANSTEAD, C.J., and HERSEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manning v. State, 461 So. 2d 1025, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 129 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

461 So. 2d 1025 (Manning v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Queen v. Clearwater Elec., Inc.
555 So. 2d 1262 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Brady v. State
518 So. 2d 1305 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Knight v. State
501 So. 2d 150 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Davis v. State
495 So. 2d 928 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)