Manning v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Manning v. State

937 S.W.2d 185, 327 Ark. 380, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 81

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedFebruary 17, 1997

DocketCR 97-102

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 937 S.W.2d 185 (Manning v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manning v. State, 937 S.W.2d 185, 327 Ark. 380, 1997 Ark. LEXIS 81 (Ark. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Clarence Manning, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Chris Jester, admits in his motion that the record was tendered 48 days late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI