Manning v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Manning v. State

612 So. 2d 1267, 1993 Ala. LEXIS 99, 1993 WL 16371

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJanuary 29, 1993

Docket1911994

StatusPublished

This text of 612 So. 2d 1267 (Manning v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manning v. State, 612 So. 2d 1267, 1993 Ala. LEXIS 99, 1993 WL 16371 (Ala. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

KENNEDY, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied.

The Court of Criminal Appeals held that the State did not violate the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act when it did not try the defendant, an intrastate prisoner, within 90 days of his request for a speedy trial. 612 So.2d 1262. That court determined that the defendant had failed to comply with certain notice requirements of the Act.

We deny this petition for certiorari review, because this Court has now held unconstitutional the portions of the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act applying to intrastate prisoners. Ex parte Springer, [Ms. 1910874, December 11, 1992], 1992 WL 362041 (Ala.1992).

WRIT DENIED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES and HOUSTON, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI