Manning v. Phillips
This text of 11 Rob. 198 (Manning v. Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This, is the third attachment case brought under our consideration, under the facts disclosed in the case of Barker and another v. Phillips, just decided, and it must be disposed of in the same manner.
It is, therefore, ordered and decreed, that the judgment of the Commercial Court, so far as it annuls the sale of the goods attached from Phillips to the intervenor, by dismissing the intervention on its merits, be affirmed; but it is further ordered and decreed, that the said intervenor and appellant do recover the [199]*199sum of sixteen hundred dollars, to be paid to Mm out of the proceeds of the sale of the goods attached, in the three suits, the balance of said proceeds to be divided between the three attaching creditors according to law; and that the plaintiff and appellee pay the costs of this appeal.
(See order modifying this judgment, infra p. 200.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Rob. 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manning-v-phillips-la-1845.