Manning v. Paul
77 A.D.2d 807, 432 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12573
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. (See Grozek v Ragu Foods, 63 AD2d 858; Chin v American Tel. & Tel. Co., 96 Misc 2d 1070, affd 70 AD2d 791.) (Appeal from order of Oneida Supreme Court—partial summary judgment.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Callahan and Moule, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Manning v. Paul, 77 A.D.2d 807, 432 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12573 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).
77 A.D.2d 807 (Manning v. Paul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Grozek v. Ragu Foods, Inc.
63 A.D.2d 858 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Chin v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
96 Misc. 2d 1070 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)