Manning v. Mayor of Baltimore

Baltimore City Circuit Court

Manning v. Mayor of Baltimore

3 Balt. C. Rep. 83

Baltimore City Circuit Court·Decided May 7, 1910·Published

Opinion

NILES, J.—

In the cases heretofore tried in the Baltimore City Court between the same parties certain facts were involved which were necessary for the decision of those cases, and the decision as to which must now make them res judicatse.

Taking these facts as conceded, the plaintiffs are entitled to the relief sought.

It may be only proper to say, in addition, that the weight of the evidence taken before me would force me to the same conclusion, wore the matter res nova.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NILES, J.—

In the cases heretofore tried in the Baltimore City Court between the same parties certain facts were involved which were necessary for the decision of those cases, and the decision as to which must now make them res judicatse.

Taking these facts as conceded, the plaintiffs are entitled to the relief sought.

It may be only proper to say, in addition, that the weight of the evidence taken before me would force me to the same conclusion, wore the matter res nova.

Manning v. Mayor of Baltimore, 3 Balt. C. Rep. 83 (Md. Super. Ct. 1910).

Pincite

3 Balt. C. Rep. 83 (Manning v. Mayor of Baltimore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.