Manning v. Mallard
This text of 85 S.E. 1039 (Manning v. Mallard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Land conveyed by a sheriff was thus described in the entry of levy and in the deed: “A certain lot in the city of Atlanta, in ward 4, land lot 19 of the 14th district of Eulton County, Georgia,, fronting fifty feet on the east side of Randolph street, between Edge-wood and Auburn streets and running back one hundred feet, more or [10]*10less, in an easterly direction. The house on said lot known as No. 21 on said street according to street number. The same being improved property of the City of Atlanta, Ga., adjoining O. Callahan; and levied on as the property of Tausey Cook.” Held, that the deed was not void because of insufficient description of the property purported to be conveyed. Singleton v. Close, 130 Ga. 716 (61 S. E. 722).
2. The case was tried by the judge without a jury, upon consent of parties. The evidence supports liis judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 S.E. 1039, 144 Ga. 9, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manning-v-mallard-ga-1915.