Manning v. Lowdermilk

District of Columbia

Manning v. Lowdermilk

1 D.C. 282

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedDecember 15, 1805

StatusPublished

This text of 1 D.C. 282 (Manning v. Lowdermilk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manning v. Lowdermilk, 1 D.C. 282 (D.D.C. 1805).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of

the Court

was, that the jury must be satisfied that the defendant received the money, but that the delivery of the inward cargo to the owners, without the consent of the-plaintiff, is evidence of the defendant’s receipt of his commissions, which the defendant in this case ought not to be permitted to deny.

Kilty, C. J., absent.

Note. Kilty, C. J., Was appointed Chancellor of Maryland, on the 26th of January, 1806, and did not afterwards sit in this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of

the Court

was, that the jury must be satisfied that the defendant received the money, but that the delivery of the inward cargo to the owners, without the consent of the-plaintiff, is evidence of the defendant’s receipt of his commissions, which the defendant in this case ought not to be permitted to deny.

Kilty, C. J., absent.

Note. Kilty, C. J., Was appointed Chancellor of Maryland, on the 26th of January, 1806, and did not afterwards sit in this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 D.C. 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manning-v-lowdermilk-dcd-1805.