Manning v. Giles

73 So. 428, 198 Ala. 151, 1916 Ala. LEXIS 192
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 7, 1916·Published

Opinion

SOMERVILLE, J.

Plaintiff sued in the circuit court on the common counts for $65, and the case was tried on the general issue by the court without a jury. There was judgment for plaintiff for $18.50, whereupon defendant moved that the judgment be set aside and the suit dismissed, on the ground that the sum recovered was not within the jurisdiction of the court.

There being no question of set-off, and plaintiff not having filed any affidavit that a sum in excess of $50 was actually due [152]*152him, as required by the statute (Code, § 5355), the motion should have been granted.—Camp v. Marion County, 91 Ala. 240, 8 South. 786; Smith v. Allen, 142 Ala. 148, 37 South. 933.

Let the judgment be reversed, and one here rendered setting aside the judgment and dismissing the suit.

Reversed and rendered.

McClellan, Mayfield, and Thomas, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manning v. Giles, 73 So. 428, 198 Ala. 151, 1916 Ala. LEXIS 192 (Ala. 1916).

73 So. 428 (Manning v. Giles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Camp v. Marion County
91 Ala. 240 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)
Smith v. Allen
142 Ala. 148 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1904)