Manning v. Giles

73 So. 428, 198 Ala. 151, 1916 Ala. LEXIS 192
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 7, 1916
StatusPublished

This text of 73 So. 428 (Manning v. Giles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manning v. Giles, 73 So. 428, 198 Ala. 151, 1916 Ala. LEXIS 192 (Ala. 1916).

Opinion

SOMERVILLE, J.

Plaintiff sued in the circuit court on the common counts for $65, and the case was tried on the general issue by the court without a jury. There was judgment for plaintiff for $18.50, whereupon defendant moved that the judgment be set aside and the suit dismissed, on the ground that the sum recovered was not within the jurisdiction of the court.

There being no question of set-off, and plaintiff not having filed any affidavit that a sum in excess of $50 was actually due [152]*152him, as required by the statute (Code, § 5355), the motion should have been granted.—Camp v. Marion County, 91 Ala. 240, 8 South. 786; Smith v. Allen, 142 Ala. 148, 37 South. 933.

Let the judgment be reversed, and one here rendered setting aside the judgment and dismissing the suit.

Reversed and rendered.

McClellan, Mayfield, and Thomas, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Camp v. Marion County
91 Ala. 240 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)
Smith v. Allen
142 Ala. 148 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 So. 428, 198 Ala. 151, 1916 Ala. LEXIS 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manning-v-giles-ala-1916.