Manning v. Dale Engineering Co.

240 A.D. 749
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 240 A.D. 749 (Manning v. Dale Engineering Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manning v. Dale Engineering Co., 240 A.D. 749 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On this record there is insufficient proof that appellant or either of his truck drivers had actual or constructive notice that these trucks had east any stones at any time, and the finding of negligence in appellant is against the weight of the evidence. Under the circumstances, there is no basis for a conclusion that such a mishap as that which resulted in injuring plaintiff Jessie L. Manning was within the reasonable apprehension of appellant. All concur, except Thompson, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance. Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. [See post, p. 756.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Bolyard
97 S.E.2d 58 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1957)
Miller v. Gonzalez
4 Misc. 2d 223 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1956)
Demjanik v. Kultau
242 A.D. 255 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
240 A.D. 749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manning-v-dale-engineering-co-nyappdiv-1933.