Manning v. Coughlin

191 A.D.2d 1046, 595 N.Y.S.2d 354, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3048

Opinion

—Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The determination of the Hearing Officer that petitioner violated 7 NYCRR 270.2 (B) (14) (i) was supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Hernandez v LeFevre, 150 AD2d 954, 955, lv denied 74 NY2d 615).

Petitioner’s other contentions were not raised in his administrative appeal and are, therefore, beyond the scope of our [1047]*1047review (see, Matter of Nelson v Coughlin, 188 AD2d 1071). (Article 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manning v. Coughlin, 191 A.D.2d 1046, 595 N.Y.S.2d 354, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3048 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

191 A.D.2d 1046 (Manning v. Coughlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hernandez v. LeFevre
150 A.D.2d 954 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Nelson v. Coughlin
188 A.D.2d 1071 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)