Manning v. Columbian Lodge, No. 117

45 A. 1092, 57 N.J. Eq. 338, 1898 N.J. LEXIS 78
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 17, 1897·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in- the court of chancery.

For affirmance — Collins, Depue, Dixon, Garrison; Lippincott, Van Syckel, Adams, Bogert, Hendrickson, Nikon, Vredenburgh — 11. • ■ -

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manning v. Columbian Lodge, No. 117, 45 A. 1092, 57 N.J. Eq. 338, 1898 N.J. LEXIS 78 (N.J. 1897).

45 A. 1092 (Manning v. Columbian Lodge, No. 117) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rubenstein v. Rubenstein
123 A.2d 67 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
E. P. Wilbur Trust Co. v. Fahrendorf
265 N.W. 1 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1936)