Manning v. City of New York

11 A.D.3d 335, 782 N.Y.S.2d 913, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12159
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 19, 2004·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Faviola A. Soto, J.), entered March 6, 2003, which, in an action for personal injuries allegedly sustained by plaintiff as an infant while in the care of a residential treatment facility, granted defendants’ motions to strike plaintiff’s bill of particulars dated December 17, 2002, with leave to plaintiff to serve a bill of particulars properly limited to the scope of the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff s bill of particulars alleging no less than six actionable occurrences over a period of no less than six months was properly stricken where the complaint alleges only one occurrence on only one day. We note a prior unappealed order denying a motion by plaintiff to amend the complaint. We decline plaintiffs request to prune the bill. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Ellerin and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manning v. City of New York, 11 A.D.3d 335, 782 N.Y.S.2d 913, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12159 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

11 A.D.3d 335 (Manning v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Behren v. Warren Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
24 A.D.3d 132 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)