Manning v. Childress

48 App. D.C. 256, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 2307
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJanuary 6, 1919
DocketNo. 3150
StatusPublished

This text of 48 App. D.C. 256 (Manning v. Childress) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manning v. Childress, 48 App. D.C. 256, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 2307 (D.C. Cir. 1919).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Van Orsdel

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This case is ruled in every particular by our opinion of this date in the case of Hutchins v. Hutchins, No. 2888, post, 286.

The judgment is reversed, with costs, to be taxed against the estate of Charlotte T. Dailey, deceased, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with our opinion. Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 App. D.C. 256, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 2307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manning-v-childress-cadc-1919.