Manning (Michael) Vs. State
This text of Manning (Michael) Vs. State (Manning (Michael) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MICHAEL ALLEN MANNING, No. 79564 Appellant, VS. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. :SFP 3 0 2019 CIE 2 Er vAL--.:En k GRO OF' Ei, 0 ,,,E,ME COURT BY ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL Depulliiw--.
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a "motion for credit against sentence and judgment of conviction." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; William D. Kephart, Judge. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a "motion for credit against sentence and judgment of conviction," this court lacks jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (explaining that the right to appeal is statutory; where no statute or court rule provides for an appeal, no right to appeal exists). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
J. Parraguirre Cadish
/ 61 - (6'vo cc: Hon. William D. Kephart, District Judge Michael Allen Manning Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Manning (Michael) Vs. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manning-michael-vs-state-nev-2019.