Manning (Michael) Vs. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided September 30, 2019·No. 79564·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MICHAEL ALLEN MANNING, No. 79564 Appellant,

VS.

THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. :SFP 3 0 2019 CIE

2

Er vAL--.:En k GRO

OF' Ei, 0 ,,,E,ME COURT

BY

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL Depulliiw--.

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a "motion for credit against sentence and judgment of conviction." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; William D. Kephart, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a "motion for credit against sentence and judgment of conviction," this court lacks jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (explaining that the right to appeal is statutory; where no statute or court rule provides for an appeal, no right to appeal exists). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

J.

Parraguirre Cadish

/ 61 - (6'vo

cc: Hon. William D. Kephart, District Judge Michael Allen Manning Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manning (Michael) Vs. State, (Neb. 2019).

Manning (Michael) Vs. State (Manning (Michael) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)