Manners v. Manners

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Manners v. Manners

198 A.D.2d 725, 605 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11021

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 24, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 198 A.D.2d 725 (Manners v. Manners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manners v. Manners, 198 A.D.2d 725, 605 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11021 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Montgomery County (Catena, J.), entered [726]*726June 30, 1992, which, in two proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, partially granted petitioner’s applications to, inter alia, direct respondent to pay for support of his children.

The judgment of divorce and the stipulation referred to therein may not be collaterally attacked on this appeal from Family Court’s order. Respondent’s arguments relating to those documents are therefore not properly before this Court. Further, to the extent that respondent’s arguments may be raised on this appeal, we find his contentions to be without merit.

Weiss, P. J., Mikoll, Yesawich Jr., Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Montgomery County (Catena, J.), entered [726]*726June 30, 1992, which, in two proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, partially granted petitioner’s applications to, inter alia, direct respondent to pay for support of his children.

The judgment of divorce and the stipulation referred to therein may not be collaterally attacked on this appeal from Family Court’s order. Respondent’s arguments relating to those documents are therefore not properly before this Court. Further, to the extent that respondent’s arguments may be raised on this appeal, we find his contentions to be without merit.

Weiss, P. J., Mikoll, Yesawich Jr., Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 A.D.2d 725, 605 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manners-v-manners-nyappdiv-1993.