Mannaberg v. Culbertson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mannaberg v. Culbertson

262 A.D. 1013, 30 N.Y.S.2d 512

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 31, 1941

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 262 A.D. 1013 (Mannaberg v. Culbertson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mannaberg v. Culbertson, 262 A.D. 1013, 30 N.Y.S.2d 512 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeals should be dismissed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent, for the reason that the amended complaint to which the motions were directed has been superseded by a second amended complaint, which is not before the court.

Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.

Appeals dismissed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appeals should be dismissed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent, for the reason that the amended complaint to which the motions were directed has been superseded by a second amended complaint, which is not before the court.

Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.

Appeals dismissed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D. 1013, 30 N.Y.S.2d 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mannaberg-v-culbertson-nyappdiv-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack