Manna v. McCall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Manna v. McCall

219 A.D.2d 752, 631 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9165

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 7, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 219 A.D.2d 752 (Manna v. McCall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manna v. McCall, 219 A.D.2d 752, 631 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9165 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement benefits.

Petitioner, a school custodian, injured her back while moving a metal filing cabinet with a hand cart. Her application for accidental disability retirement benefits was denied on the ground that her injury was not the result of an "accident” within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law. Upon review of the record, there is substantial evidence supporting respondent’s conclusion that petitioner failed to meet her burden of proving that she was injured due to an accident. In addition, we have considered petitioner’s due process arguments and find them to be without merit.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Yesawich Jr., and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement benefits.

Petitioner, a school custodian, injured her back while moving a metal filing cabinet with a hand cart. Her application for accidental disability retirement benefits was denied on the ground that her injury was not the result of an "accident” within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law. Upon review of the record, there is substantial evidence supporting respondent’s conclusion that petitioner failed to meet her burden of proving that she was injured due to an accident. In addition, we have considered petitioner’s due process arguments and find them to be without merit.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Yesawich Jr., and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

219 A.D.2d 752, 631 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manna-v-mccall-nyappdiv-1995.