Mann v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Mann v. State

1919 OK CR 105, 178 P. 894, 15 Okla. Crim. 691, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 67

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 10, 1919

DocketNo. A-3181.

StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK CR 105 (Mann v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mann v. State, 1919 OK CR 105, 178 P. 894, 15 Okla. Crim. 691, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 67 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause lias been pending on appeal in this court since the 1st day of November, 1917. No brief has been riled in behalf of plaintiff in error, nor was any appearance made to orally argue this cause at the time same was submitted.

Rule IX of this court provides:

“When no counsel appears, and no briefs are filed, the court will examine the pleadings, the instructions of the court and the exceptions taken thereto, and the judgment and sentence, and if no prejudicial error appears, will affirm the judgment.”

*692 After a careful examination of the record, the court finds no error sufficiently prejudicial to authorize a reversal of this judgment, and. the same is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause lias been pending on appeal in this court since the 1st day of November, 1917. No brief has been riled in behalf of plaintiff in error, nor was any appearance made to orally argue this cause at the time same was submitted.

Rule IX of this court provides:

“When no counsel appears, and no briefs are filed, the court will examine the pleadings, the instructions of the court and the exceptions taken thereto, and the judgment and sentence, and if no prejudicial error appears, will affirm the judgment.”

*692 After a careful examination of the record, the court finds no error sufficiently prejudicial to authorize a reversal of this judgment, and. the same is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1919 OK CR 105, 178 P. 894, 15 Okla. Crim. 691, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mann-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.