Mann v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Mann v. State

228 S.W.3d 95, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1026, 2007 WL 1977130

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mann v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 72 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 10, 2007·No. ED 88929·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James L. Mann appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James L. Mann appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Mann v. State, 228 S.W.3d 95, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1026, 2007 WL 1977130 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

228 S.W.3d 95 (Mann v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.