Mann v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Mann v. State

228 S.W.3d 95, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1026, 2007 WL 1977130

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 10, 2007

DocketED 88929

StatusPublished

This text of 228 S.W.3d 95 (Mann v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mann v. State, 228 S.W.3d 95, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1026, 2007 WL 1977130 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James L. Mann appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James L. Mann appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 S.W.3d 95, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1026, 2007 WL 1977130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mann-v-state-moctapp-2007.