Mann v. State

845 So. 2d 337, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7493, 2003 WL 21175712
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mann v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 787 So. 2d 130
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 21, 2003·No. No. 3D03-194·Published

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Based on appellee State of Florida’s confession of error filed in this cause, as well as our own independent review of the record, the sentence is reversed due to the trial court’s failure to justify the sentence of life imprisonment as a violent career criminal. See Smith v. State, 842 So.2d 1047 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). The case is remanded to the trial court to allow appellant Andrew Henry Mann to withdraw his plea, or for re-sentencing within the guidelines by a different judge, pursuant to Wilson v. State, 845 So.2d 142 (Fla.2003) (the record must rebut any presumption of vindictiveness).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mann v. State, 845 So. 2d 337, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7493, 2003 WL 21175712 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

845 So. 2d 337 (Mann v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. State
845 So. 2d 142 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)
Smith v. State
842 So. 2d 1047 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)