Mann v. Perkins

4 Blackf. 271, 1837 Ind. LEXIS 18
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided March 24, 1837·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

REPLEVIN. Pleas, 1st, that the property of the goods was in Solomon Perkins; 2dly, that the defendant was a constable, and as such had taken the property by virtue of an execution issued by a justice of the peace, on a judgment against Solomon Perkins; and that the goods belonged to Solomon Perkins. Held, that the second plea might be rejected on the plaintiff’s motion; it being the same in substance with the first.

Previously to the entry by a justice of a judgment by confession, the judgment-debtor must take an oath respecting the fairness of the judgment as is prescribed by the statute; and the oath must be- filed and entered of record by the justice. Vide Ex parte Knight, Ante, p. 220, and note.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mann v. Perkins, 4 Blackf. 271, 1837 Ind. LEXIS 18 (Ind. 1837).

4 Blackf. 271 (Mann v. Perkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Simcoke v. Frederick
1 Ind. 54 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1848)