Mann v. Milne

New York Supreme Court

Mann v. Milne

28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 408

New York Supreme Court·Decided June 15, 1880·Published

Opinion

So much of the order appealed from as gives defendant leave to amend his answer affirmed ; and so much as strikes out the second and third counts of the answer, with costs, reversed, with leave to [409]*409plaintiff to demur to said counts; no costs of this appeal to either party. Held, that the remedy of the plaintiff, the counts being hypothetical, is by demurrer, and not by motion to strike out. (McCormick v. Pickering, 4 Comst., 276 ; Conger v. Johnston, 2 Den., 96 ; Code of Civ. Pro., §§ 494, 783.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

So much of the order appealed from as gives defendant leave to amend his answer affirmed ; and so much as strikes out the second and third counts of the answer, with costs, reversed, with leave to [409]*409plaintiff to demur to said counts; no costs of this appeal to either party. Held, that the remedy of the plaintiff, the counts being hypothetical, is by demurrer, and not by motion to strike out. (McCormick v. Pickering, 4 Comst., 276 ; Conger v. Johnston, 2 Den., 96 ; Code of Civ. Pro., §§ 494, 783.)

Mann v. Milne, 28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 408 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1880).

Pincite

28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 408 (Mann v. Milne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related