Mann v. Major

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mann v. Major

243 A.D. 672

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

— Judgment affirmed, with costs. We find adequate support in the evidence for the finding of the Special Term that defendant Schneeberger [predecessor of the defendant Major] has not, either as town superintendent of highways of the town of Irondequoit or individually, obstructed or changed the grade of any portion of Indian Trail avenue. All concur. (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action to compel removal of obstruction from a private way leading to plaintiff’s property.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment affirmed, with costs. We find adequate support in the evidence for the finding of the Special Term that defendant Schneeberger [predecessor of the defendant Major] has not, either as town superintendent of highways of the town of Irondequoit or individually, obstructed or changed the grade of any portion of Indian Trail avenue. All concur. (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action to compel removal of obstruction from a private way leading to plaintiff’s property.)

Mann v. Major, 243 A.D. 672 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

243 A.D. 672 (Mann v. Major) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.