Mann v. King
192 S.E.2d 400, 127 Ga. App. 39, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 772
Opinion
Plaintiff in a suit for invasion of privacy appeals from the summary judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff contends the tort committed was the sending of a letter to his employer by a creditor regarding a debt. This court has recently held that this conduct does not give rise to an action for invasion of privacy. Signal Oil &c. Co. v. Conway, 126 Ga. App. 711. See also Gouldman-Taber Pontiac v. Zerbst, 213 Ga. 682 (100 SE2d 881) on which the holding in the Signal Oil case is based.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mann v. King, 192 S.E.2d 400, 127 Ga. App. 39, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 772 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972).
192 S.E.2d 400 (Mann v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Signal Oil & Gas Co. v. Conway
191 S.E.2d 624 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Gouldman-Taber Pontiac, Inc. v. Zerbst
100 S.E.2d 881 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1957)