Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Mann v. King

Mann v. King

192 S.E.2d 400, 127 Ga. App. 39, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 772
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 5, 1972
Docket47327
StatusPublished

This text of 192 S.E.2d 400 (Mann v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mann v. King, 192 S.E.2d 400, 127 Ga. App. 39, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 772 (Ga. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

Hall, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff in a suit for invasion of privacy appeals from the summary judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff contends the tort committed was the sending of a letter to his employer by a creditor regarding a debt. This court has recently held that this conduct does not give rise to an action for invasion of privacy. Signal Oil &c. Co. v. Conway, 126 Ga. App. 711. See also Gouldman-Taber Pontiac v. Zerbst, 213 Ga. 682 (100 SE2d 881) on which the holding in the Signal Oil case is based.

Judgment affirmed.

Pannell and Quillian, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Signal Oil & Gas Co. v. Conway
191 S.E.2d 624 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Gouldman-Taber Pontiac, Inc. v. Zerbst
100 S.E.2d 881 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 S.E.2d 400, 127 Ga. App. 39, 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mann-v-king-gactapp-1972.