Mann v. . Kennedy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Mann v. . Kennedy

139 S.E. 927, 194 N.C. 794, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 227

DecidedOctober 5, 1927

StatusPublished

This text of 139 S.E. 927 (Mann v. . Kennedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mann v. . Kennedy, 139 S.E. 927, 194 N.C. 794, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 227 (N.C. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Civil action by one mortgagor and the representatives of another to recover of the mortgagee the excess for which the mortgaged premises, when sold under foreclosure, brought over and above the mortgage debt. *Page 795

Upon the facts found by his Honor, by consent sitting as both judge and jury, judgment was entered for the plaintiffs. Defendant appeals, assigning errors. Out of a confused record one fact at least seems clear, to wit, that no reversible error has been made to appear. The rights of the parties are dependent upon the facts, which have been found against the defendant.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Civil action by one mortgagor and the representatives of another to recover of the mortgagee the excess for which the mortgaged premises, when sold under foreclosure, brought over and above the mortgage debt. *Page 795

Upon the facts found by his Honor, by consent sitting as both judge and jury, judgment was entered for the plaintiffs. Defendant appeals, assigning errors. Out of a confused record one fact at least seems clear, to wit, that no reversible error has been made to appear. The rights of the parties are dependent upon the facts, which have been found against the defendant.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 S.E. 927, 194 N.C. 794, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mann-v-kennedy-nc-1927.