Mann v. Gobel

221 A.D. 775

This text of 221 A.D. 775 (Mann v. Gobel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mann v. Gobel, 221 A.D. 775 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Order of the County Court of Queens county setting aside verdict in plaintiffs’ favor affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The trial court had no power to dismiss the complaint; but this [776]*776court, upon appeal, dismisses plaintiffs’ complaint, with costs, pursuant to the provisions of section 584 of the Civil Practice Act. We do this because we are of opinion that, in view of the stipulation in the agreement or binder that plaintiffs were to receive their commissions from the defendant when the lease was signed, and it was conceded that the lease was never signed, plaintiffs have no cause of action. (Reis Co. v. Zimmerli, 155 App. Div. 260; Larson v. Burroughs, 131 id. 877; Costa v. Schetz, 175 N. Y. Supp. 476.) Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur; Lazansky, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John Reis Co. v. Zimmerli
155 A.D. 260 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
221 A.D. 775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mann-v-gobel-nyappdiv-1927.