Mann v. Glauber
22 S.E. 405, 96 Ga. 795
Opinion
1. The charge complained of, to the effect that, in the absence of an agreement to the contrary, delivery to a common carrier is delivery to the consignee, was correct. Falvey & Co. v. Richmond, 87 Ga. 99.
2. The request to charge, while in some respects legal and pertinent, contained at its conclusion expressions calculated to confuse and mislead the jury, and was therefore properly refused; the evidence fully warranted the verdict, and there was no error in denying a newtrial. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mann v. Glauber, 22 S.E. 405, 96 Ga. 795 (Ga. 1895).
22 S.E. 405 (Mann v. Glauber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Southwire Co. v. Franklin Aluminum Co.
151 S.E.2d 493 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
Parke, Davis Company v. Cook
31 S.E.2d 728 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Morgan v. Colt Co.
130 S.E. 600 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
McCook v. Halliburton-Myers Co.
80 S.E. 863 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Small Grain Distilling Co. v. Davis
74 S.E. 897 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)
McCullough Bros. v. Armstrong
45 S.E. 379 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)