Mann v. Glauber
This text of 22 S.E. 405 (Mann v. Glauber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The charge complained of, to the effect that, in the absence of an agreement to the contrary, delivery to a common carrier is delivery to the consignee, was correct. Falvey & Co. v. Richmond, 87 Ga. 99.
2. The request to charge, while in some respects legal and pertinent, contained at its conclusion expressions calculated to confuse and mislead the jury, and was therefore properly refused; the evidence fully warranted the verdict, and there was no error in denying a newtrial. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 S.E. 405, 96 Ga. 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mann-v-glauber-ga-1895.