Mann v. Glauber

22 S.E. 405, 96 Ga. 795
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 10, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 22 S.E. 405 (Mann v. Glauber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mann v. Glauber, 22 S.E. 405, 96 Ga. 795 (Ga. 1895).

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

1. The charge complained of, to the effect that, in the absence of an agreement to the contrary, delivery to a common carrier is delivery to the consignee, was correct. Falvey & Co. v. Richmond, 87 Ga. 99.

2. The request to charge, while in some respects legal and pertinent, contained at its conclusion expressions calculated to confuse and mislead the jury, and was therefore properly refused; the evidence fully warranted the verdict, and there was no error in denying a newtrial. Judgment affirmed.

G. J. Holton & Son, for plaintiffs in error. Graham & Parker, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Southwire Co. v. Franklin Aluminum Co.
151 S.E.2d 493 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
Parke, Davis Company v. Cook
31 S.E.2d 728 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Morgan v. Colt Co.
130 S.E. 600 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
McCook v. Halliburton-Myers Co.
80 S.E. 863 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Small Grain Distilling Co. v. Davis
74 S.E. 897 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)
McCullough Bros. v. Armstrong
45 S.E. 379 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 S.E. 405, 96 Ga. 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mann-v-glauber-ga-1895.