Mann v. Fouts

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Mann v. Fouts

89 S.E. 1047, 18 Ga. App. 528, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1097

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 15, 1916

Docket7395

StatusPublished

This text of 89 S.E. 1047 (Mann v. Fouts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mann v. Fouts, 89 S.E. 1047, 18 Ga. App. 528, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1097 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Wade, C. J.

1. There was no substantial merit in the exceptions to the answer of the magistrate which were originally allowed by the court, and the court did not err in thereafter passing upon the certiorari without regard to them.

2. There was some evidence to support the verdict of the jury in the justice’s court, and the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling and dismissing the certiorari. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wade, C. J.

1. There was no substantial merit in the exceptions to the answer of the magistrate which were originally allowed by the court, and the court did not err in thereafter passing upon the certiorari without regard to them.

2. There was some evidence to support the verdict of the jury in the justice’s court, and the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling and dismissing the certiorari. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 S.E. 1047, 18 Ga. App. 528, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 1097, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mann-v-fouts-gactapp-1916.