Manly v. Oliver

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Manly v. Oliver

92 S.E. 288, 19 Ga. App. 783, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 356

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 24, 1917

Docket8078

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 92 S.E. 288 (Manly v. Oliver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manly v. Oliver, 92 S.E. 288, 19 Ga. App. 783, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 356 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Bboyles, P. J.

1. The portion of the charge excepted to does not contain any expression or intimation of opinion as to what had been proved in the case or that the defendant could not recover, and, while subject to some slight criticism, does not require a new trial, when considered in connection with its context.

2. There was some evidence authorizing the verdict, and, it having been approved by the trial judge, and no error of law appearing, this court has no authority to reverse the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI