Manley v. Tedesco

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Manley v. Tedesco

34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 379, 1 So. 3d 1284, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1253, 2009 WL 386912

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 18, 2009

Docket2D08-312

StatusPublished

This text of 34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 379 (Manley v. Tedesco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manley v. Tedesco, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 379, 1 So. 3d 1284, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1253, 2009 WL 386912 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Manley appeals an order entered by the trial court establishing an arrearage amount of $45,877.28. We reverse. We also note that other motions were heard which were not noticed for hearing.

The hearing on the amount of the child support arrearage was inadequate for a number of reasons. The most obvious was the fact that the records of the Department of Revenue (DOR) potentially reflected a different arrearage amount from that testified to by Tedesco.

*1285 The continuance requested by Manley to allow a DOR representative to testify should have been granted.

We reverse and remand for a new hearing to determine the proper child support arrearage as due on November 20, 2007, and to enter an order that is appropriate based on that calculation.

Reversed and remanded.

WHATLEY, and LaROSE JJ., and CASE, JAMES R., Associate Senior Judge, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI