Manley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Manley v. State

285 S.W.3d 837, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 969, 2009 WL 1851103

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 30, 2009

DocketWD 69770

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 285 S.W.3d 837 (Manley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manley v. State, 285 S.W.3d 837, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 969, 2009 WL 1851103 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Cornell Manley appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 *838 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. He claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel when trial counsel failed to object to his appealing before the jury in a jail uniform and failed to ensure that he was provided with civilian clothing. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Cornell Manley appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 *838 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. He claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel when trial counsel failed to object to his appealing before the jury in a jail uniform and failed to ensure that he was provided with civilian clothing. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 S.W.3d 837, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 969, 2009 WL 1851103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manley-v-state-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack