Manley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Manley v. State

497 So. 2d 1330, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2498, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10807

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Manley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 18538 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 26, 1986·No. No. 85-335·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court departed from the sentencing guidelines and thereby aggravated appellant’s sentence.

We have reviewed the several reasons announced as a basis for the departure and find that they are clearly insufficient as a matter of law. In light of the lack of novelty in the instant case, considered in light of the volume of sentencing guideline decisions, we feel it would serve no purpose and be merely repetitive to specially review the reasons here.

We reverse and remand with instructions to resentence appellant within the sentencing guidelines.

Reversed and remanded.

LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., and WEBSTER, PETER, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court departed from the sentencing guidelines and thereby aggravated appellant’s sentence.

We have reviewed the several reasons announced as a basis for the departure and find that they are clearly insufficient as a matter of law. In light of the lack of novelty in the instant case, considered in light of the volume of sentencing guideline decisions, we feel it would serve no purpose and be merely repetitive to specially review the reasons here.

We reverse and remand with instructions to resentence appellant within the sentencing guidelines.

Reversed and remanded.

LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., and WEBSTER, PETER, Associate Judge, concur.

Manley v. State, 497 So. 2d 1330, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2498, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10807 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

497 So. 2d 1330 (Manley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.