Manley v. Mulligan Contruction Co.

107 S.W.3d 285, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 194, 2003 WL 346899
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 18, 2003
DocketNo. ED 81887
StatusPublished

This text of 107 S.W.3d 285 (Manley v. Mulligan Contruction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manley v. Mulligan Contruction Co., 107 S.W.3d 285, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 194, 2003 WL 346899 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Earl E. Manley (Employee) appeals from a Final Award Allowing Compensation (Final Award) of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) modifying an Award and Decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). Employee argues that the Commission erred in concluding that the Second Injury Fund (the Fund) has a right to subrogation for permanent total disability (PTD) benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that, following Missouri Supreme Court precedent in Cole v. Morris, 409 S.W.2d 668 (Mo.1966), the Commission did not act without or in excess of its powers in concluding that the Fund has a right to subro-gation for PTD benefits. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cole v. Morris
409 S.W.2d 668 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 S.W.3d 285, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 194, 2003 WL 346899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manley-v-mulligan-contruction-co-moctapp-2003.