Mankes v. Fishman
This text of 178 A.D. 943 (Mankes v. Fishman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed on the ground that the verdict is excessive, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event, unless the plaintiff stipulates to reduce the recovery to seventy-five dollars, in which case the judgment is so modified and as modified judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. All concurred, Cochrane, J., not sitting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
178 A.D. 943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mankes-v-fishman-nyappdiv-1917.