Manish Sohani and Anis Virani v. Sunesara Nizar
This text of Manish Sohani and Anis Virani v. Sunesara Nizar (Manish Sohani and Anis Virani v. Sunesara Nizar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: Manisch Sohani and Anis Virani v. Nizar Sunesara
Appellate case number: 01-20-00114-CV
Trial court case number: 2016-08068
Trial court: 295th District Court of Harris County
On September 8, 2020, Louis F. Teran filed a Motion to Admit Pro Hac Vice, seeking admission to act as lead counsel for appellants Manisch Sohani and Anis Virani in this appeal. Keval M. Patel, local counsel for appellants, filed a Motion in Support of the Mr. Teran’s pro hac vice motion. The motion conforms to Rule XIX of the Texas Rules Governing Admissions to the Bar of Texas. See TEX. RULES GOVERN. BAR ADM’N R. XIX(a) (West 2018).
Accordingly, the Motion to Admit Pro Hac Vice is granted.
Appellants’ filed their brief on September 8, 2020. The Clerk of this Court is directed to accept appellants’ brief as of the date of this order. Accordingly, appellee’s brief is due to be filed no later than 30 days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b).
It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: __/s/ Evelyn V. Keyes_____________________________________ Acting individually Acting for the Court
Date: __September 15, 2020____________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Manish Sohani and Anis Virani v. Sunesara Nizar, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manish-sohani-and-anis-virani-v-sunesara-nizar-texapp-2020.