Maniscalo v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Maniscalo v. State

123 So. 922, 98 Fla. 468

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 25, 1929·Published

Opinion

The alleged judgment to which this writ of error is addressed is nothing more than the sentence of the court. It contains no adjudication by the court of the guilt of the defendant. Johnson v. State, 81 Fla. 783, 89 So. R. 114, and cases cited; Timmons v. State, 119 So. R. 393; Caughn v. State, 122 So. R. 565. As indicated in the cases cited, a so-called judgment which contains no *Page 469 adjudication by the court of the guilt of the defendant, does not constitute such a final judgment as will support a writ of error. The writ of error in this case, therefore, must be quashed.

Writ of error quashed.

TERRELL, C. J., AND ELLIS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The alleged judgment to which this writ of error is addressed is nothing more than the sentence of the court. It contains no adjudication by the court of the guilt of the defendant. Johnson v. State, 81 Fla. 783, 89 So. R. 114, and cases cited; Timmons v. State, 119 So. R. 393; Caughn v. State, 122 So. R. 565. As indicated in the cases cited, a so-called judgment which contains no *Page 469 adjudication by the court of the guilt of the defendant, does not constitute such a final judgment as will support a writ of error. The writ of error in this case, therefore, must be quashed.

Writ of error quashed.

TERRELL, C. J., AND ELLIS, J., concur.

Maniscalo v. State, 123 So. 922, 98 Fla. 468 (Fla. 1929).

Pincite

123 So. 922 (Maniscalo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related