Home/Supreme Court of Florida/Maniscalo v. State

Maniscalo v. State

123 So. 922, 98 Fla. 468
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 25, 1929
StatusPublished

This text of 123 So. 922 (Maniscalo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maniscalo v. State, 123 So. 922, 98 Fla. 468 (Fla. 1929).

Opinion

The alleged judgment to which this writ of error is addressed is nothing more than the sentence of the court. It contains no adjudication by the court of the guilt of the defendant. Johnson v. State, 81 Fla. 783, 89 So. R. 114, and cases cited; Timmons v. State, 119 So. R. 393; Caughn v. State, 122 So. R. 565. As indicated in the cases cited, a so-called judgment which contains no *Page 469 adjudication by the court of the guilt of the defendant, does not constitute such a final judgment as will support a writ of error. The writ of error in this case, therefore, must be quashed.

Writ of error quashed.

TERRELL, C. J., AND ELLIS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. State
89 So. 114 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 So. 922, 98 Fla. 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maniscalo-v-state-fla-1929.