Maniscalco v. Tully and Di Napoli, Inc.

82 N.E.2d 586, 298 N.Y. 688
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 22, 1948
StatusPublished

This text of 82 N.E.2d 586 (Maniscalco v. Tully and Di Napoli, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maniscalco v. Tully and Di Napoli, Inc., 82 N.E.2d 586, 298 N.Y. 688 (N.Y. 1948).

Opinion

*690 As to the defendant Tully and Di Napoli, Inc.: Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that there was no evidence of negligence of that defendant. No opinion.

Concur: LotjghraN, Ch. J., Lewis, Desmond and Fuld, JJ. Dissenting: Conwat and Dye, J J. Taking no part: Thacher, J.

As to the defendant B. Turecamo Contracting Co., Inc.: Judgments reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that there was evidence of negligence of that defendant which should have been submitted to the jury. No opinion.

Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Dye and Fuld, JJ. Dissenting: Desmond, J. Taking no part: Thacher, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 N.E.2d 586, 298 N.Y. 688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maniscalco-v-tully-and-di-napoli-inc-ny-1948.