Maniscalco v. Tully and Di Napoli, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Maniscalco v. Tully and Di Napoli, Inc.

82 N.E.2d 586, 298 N.Y. 688

New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 22, 1948·Published

Opinion

*690 As to the defendant Tully and Di Napoli, Inc.: Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that there was no evidence of negligence of that defendant. No opinion.

Concur: LotjghraN, Ch. J., Lewis, Desmond and Fuld, JJ. Dissenting: Conwat and Dye, J J. Taking no part: Thacher, J.

As to the defendant B. Turecamo Contracting Co., Inc.: Judgments reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that there was evidence of negligence of that defendant which should have been submitted to the jury. No opinion.

Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Dye and Fuld, JJ. Dissenting: Desmond, J. Taking no part: Thacher, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*690 As to the defendant Tully and Di Napoli, Inc.: Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that there was no evidence of negligence of that defendant. No opinion.

Concur: LotjghraN, Ch. J., Lewis, Desmond and Fuld, JJ. Dissenting: Conwat and Dye, J J. Taking no part: Thacher, J.

As to the defendant B. Turecamo Contracting Co., Inc.: Judgments reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that there was evidence of negligence of that defendant which should have been submitted to the jury. No opinion.

Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Dye and Fuld, JJ. Dissenting: Desmond, J. Taking no part: Thacher, J.

Maniscalco v. Tully and Di Napoli, Inc., 82 N.E.2d 586, 298 N.Y. 688 (N.Y. 1948).

Pincite

82 N.E.2d 586 (Maniscalco v. Tully and Di Napoli, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.