Maniscalco v. State

98 Fla. 468
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 25, 1929·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Brown, J.

The alleged judgment to which this writ of error is addressed is nothing more than the sentence of the court. It contains no adjudication by the court of the guilt of the defendant. Johnson v. State, 81 Fla. 783, 89 So. R. 114, and cases cited; Timmons v. State, 119 So. R. 393; Caughn v. State, 122 So. R. 565. As indicated in the eases cited, a so-called judgment which contains no [469] adjudication by the court of the guilt of the defendant, does not constitute such a final judgment as will support a writ of error. The writ of error in this case, therefore, must be quashed.

Writ of error quashed.

Terreli,, C. J., and Ellis, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maniscalco v. State, 98 Fla. 468 (Fla. 1929).

98 Fla. 468 (Maniscalco v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scroggins v. State
169 So. 547 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Anderson v. Chapman
146 So. 675 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Ellis v. State
129 So. 106 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)