Maniscalco v. State

98 Fla. 468
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 25, 1929
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 98 Fla. 468 (Maniscalco v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maniscalco v. State, 98 Fla. 468 (Fla. 1929).

Opinion

Brown, J.

The alleged judgment to which this writ of error is addressed is nothing more than the sentence of the court. It contains no adjudication by the court of the guilt of the defendant. Johnson v. State, 81 Fla. 783, 89 So. R. 114, and cases cited; Timmons v. State, 119 So. R. 393; Caughn v. State, 122 So. R. 565. As indicated in the eases cited, a so-called judgment which contains no [469]*469adjudication by the court of the guilt of the defendant, does not constitute such a final judgment as will support a writ of error. The writ of error in this case, therefore, must be quashed.

Writ of error quashed.

Terreli,, C. J., and Ellis, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scroggins v. State
169 So. 547 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Anderson v. Chapman
146 So. 675 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Ellis v. State
129 So. 106 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 Fla. 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maniscalco-v-state-fla-1929.