Manion v. State

11 Mo. 578
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedJuly 15, 1848
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 11 Mo. 578 (Manion v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manion v. State, 11 Mo. 578 (Mo. 1848).

Opinion

Scott, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Manion was convicted before a justice of the peace of an assault and battery, and fined. . He took an appeal to the Circuit Court from the judgment of the justice. In his affidavit for an appeal he stated that he believed he was “injured” by the judgment of the. justice. The word of the statute is “aggrieved.” For this informality in the affidavit, the appeal was dismissed and a judgment rendered against the appellant and his surety.

It has been frequently held by this Court that it is error to dismiss an [579]*579appeal, and to reverse the judgment of a justice. By dismissing the appeal the court loses cognizance of the subject. When an appeal is dismissed the judgment of the justice stands in full force.

The affidavit was a substantial compliance with the law, and was sufficient to have entitled the party to his appeal. Had it been otherwise, the 22d section of the act under which this proceeding was had would have empowered the court to permit its amendment.

The other Judges concurring,

the judgment will be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas v. Missouri Town Mutual Fire Insurance
89 Mo. App. 12 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1901)
DeBolt v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railway Co.
27 S.W. 575 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1894)
Armstrong v. Armstrong
36 Mo. 225 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1865)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Mo. 578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manion-v-state-mo-1848.