Manion v. General Electric Co.

Eleventh Circuit

Manion v. General Electric Co.

272 F. App'x 779

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 2, 2008·No. No. 07-15314·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The sole issue on this appeal is the propriety of the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Defendant. Having carefully considered the [780] briefs and relevant parts of the record, we conclude that the court properly granted General Electric Company’s motion for summary judgment. The content, placement, and presentation of the warnings it provided were adequate to place the Plaintiff on notice that his range could tip if the anti-tip device was not properly installed.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The sole issue on this appeal is the propriety of the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Defendant. Having carefully considered the [780] briefs and relevant parts of the record, we conclude that the court properly granted General Electric Company’s motion for summary judgment. The content, placement, and presentation of the warnings it provided were adequate to place the Plaintiff on notice that his range could tip if the anti-tip device was not properly installed.

AFFIRMED.

Manion v. General Electric Co., 272 F. App'x 779 (11th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

272 F. App'x 779 (Manion v. General Electric Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.