Manion v. General Electric Co.

Eleventh Circuit

Manion v. General Electric Co.

272 F. App'x 779

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedApril 2, 2008

DocketNo. 07-15314

StatusPublished

This text of 272 F. App'x 779 (Manion v. General Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manion v. General Electric Co., 272 F. App'x 779 (11th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The sole issue on this appeal is the propriety of the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Defendant. Having carefully considered the [780]*780briefs and relevant parts of the record, we conclude that the court properly granted General Electric Company’s motion for summary judgment. The content, placement, and presentation of the warnings it provided were adequate to place the Plaintiff on notice that his range could tip if the anti-tip device was not properly installed.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The sole issue on this appeal is the propriety of the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Defendant. Having carefully considered the [780]*780briefs and relevant parts of the record, we conclude that the court properly granted General Electric Company’s motion for summary judgment. The content, placement, and presentation of the warnings it provided were adequate to place the Plaintiff on notice that his range could tip if the anti-tip device was not properly installed.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 F. App'x 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manion-v-general-electric-co-ca11-2008.