Home/U.S. Customs Court/Manilowitz v. United States

Manilowitz v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 409
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJanuary 7, 1958
DocketNo. 61441; protests 306518-K and 305076-K (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 40 Cust. Ct. 409 (Manilowitz v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manilowitz v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 409 (cusc 1958).

Opinion

[410]*410Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with, stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sprats in oil, packed in tins, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Arnold Sorensin Co,, Inc., et al. v. United States (38 Cust. Ct. 199, C. D. 1862), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arnold Sorensin Co. v. United States
38 Cust. Ct. 199 (U.S. Customs Court, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 Cust. Ct. 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manilowitz-v-united-states-cusc-1958.