Manicchia v. State

190 S.W. 1113
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 27, 1916
DocketNo. 4323
StatusPublished

This text of 190 S.W. 1113 (Manicchia v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manicchia v. State, 190 S.W. 1113 (Tex. 1916).

Opinion

HARPER, J.

Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $25.

Appellant was tried in the criminal district court of Dallas county; a jury of 12 men being impaneled. The verdict was returned by 11 of the jurors — one of the jurors, J. R. Bell, refusing to concur in or sign the verdict. This question was recently before this court in Cortonelia v. State, 189 S. W. 139, and Renfro v. State, 189 S. W. 137; and for the reasons stated in these eases this case must be reversed and remanded.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Renfro v. State
189 S.W.2d 137 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)
Cortonelia v. State
189 S.W.2d 139 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 S.W. 1113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manicchia-v-state-texcrimapp-1916.