Maniatakos v. Hirsch
This text of 106 So. 3d 953 (Maniatakos v. Hirsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant contends, and the State properly concedes, that the trial court erred in summarily adjudicating appellant guilty of direct criminal contempt without complying with the procedures set forth in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830. See Bouie v. State, 784 So.2d 521, 523 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Contrary to appellant’s argument, we find the personal insults and charges of corruption directed towards the trial judge at the conclusion of the hearing were contemptuous on their face. See Martin v. State, 711 So.2d 1173 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Accordingly, we remand for further proceedings during which appellant may be given the opportunity to show cause why he should not be adjudged guilty of contempt and to present evidence of excusing or mitigating circumstances in compliance with Rule 3.830.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
106 So. 3d 953, 2013 WL 85447, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maniatakos-v-hirsch-fladistctapp-2013.