Manhattan Trust Co. v. Miller

Michigan Supreme Court

Manhattan Trust Co. v. Miller

1 McGrath 1399

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 9, 1895

DocketNo. 15012

StatusPublished

This text of 1 McGrath 1399 (Manhattan Trust Co. v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manhattan Trust Co. v. Miller, 1 McGrath 1399 (Mich. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

To compel respondent to pay a certain warrant issued to relator.

The circuit judge granted the writ.

Affirmed November 9, 1895, with costs.

The warrant was payable from the hydrant rental fund, and [1401]*1401while respondent answered that there was no money in that fund, it appeared that he had been directed by the common council to transfer a sufficient amount from the general fund to the hydrant rental fund, and respondent contended that such transfer had not been made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

To compel respondent to pay a certain warrant issued to relator.

The circuit judge granted the writ.

Affirmed November 9, 1895, with costs.

The warrant was payable from the hydrant rental fund, and [1401]*1401while respondent answered that there was no money in that fund, it appeared that he had been directed by the common council to transfer a sufficient amount from the general fund to the hydrant rental fund, and respondent contended that such transfer had not been made.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 McGrath 1399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manhattan-trust-co-v-miller-mich-1895.