Manhattan Syndicate, Inc. v. Lilly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Manhattan Syndicate, Inc. v. Lilly

12 A.D.2d 743, 209 N.Y.S.2d 563, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13160

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 17, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 743 (Manhattan Syndicate, Inc. v. Lilly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manhattan Syndicate, Inc. v. Lilly, 12 A.D.2d 743, 209 N.Y.S.2d 563, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13160 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered August 1, 1960, vacating default judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to plaintiff-appellant, and motion denied, with $10 costs, without prejudice to its renewal in a proper county. The directions of subdivisions 1 and 2 of rule 63 of the Rules of Civil Practice requiring that a motion in an action triable in the First Judicial District must be made in that district constitute a procedural mandate, whether or not the Madison County Special Term had jurisdiction; and the objection to “ jurisdiction ” taken by appellant sufficiently invoked the rule to require either a denial of [744]*744the motion on procedural grounds or its transfer to the New York Special Term. A stay of execution of 60 days is granted to allow defendant to renew the motion in accordance with the rule. Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered August 1, 1960, vacating default judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to plaintiff-appellant, and motion denied, with $10 costs, without prejudice to its renewal in a proper county. The directions of subdivisions 1 and 2 of rule 63 of the Rules of Civil Practice requiring that a motion in an action triable in the First Judicial District must be made in that district constitute a procedural mandate, whether or not the Madison County Special Term had jurisdiction; and the objection to “ jurisdiction ” taken by appellant sufficiently invoked the rule to require either a denial of [744]*744the motion on procedural grounds or its transfer to the New York Special Term. A stay of execution of 60 days is granted to allow defendant to renew the motion in accordance with the rule. Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Bergan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 743, 209 N.Y.S.2d 563, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manhattan-syndicate-inc-v-lilly-nyappdiv-1961.